Netflix’s ‘Reality Check’ Confronts the Painful Legacy of ‘America’s Next Top Model’

Lean Thomas

Netflix's 'America's Next Top Model' docuseries doesn't let Tyra Banks off easy
CREDITS: Wikimedia CC BY-SA 3.0

Share this post

Netflix's 'America's Next Top Model' docuseries doesn't let Tyra Banks off easy

A Show Born from Disruption Meets Reckoning (Image Credits: Pixabay)

Netflix premiered a three-part docuseries that delves into the highs and lows of the long-running reality competition ‘America’s Next Top Model,’ spotlighting creator Tyra Banks and the personal toll on participants.[1][2]

A Show Born from Disruption Meets Reckoning

Directors Mor Loushy and Daniel Sivan crafted ‘Reality Check: Inside America’s Next Top Model’ to unpack the series that aired for 24 cycles starting in 2003. Former contestants, judges, and Banks herself sat for interviews, revealing tensions between the show’s inclusive goals and its pursuit of drama.[3]

Banks described her initial drive to challenge the fashion industry’s narrow standards. She aimed to prove beauty encompassed diversity, yet production choices often amplified conflict for ratings. The docuseries traces this evolution across episodes titled “On Top,” “Still in the Running,” and “Rooting for You.”[1]

Contestants Recount Lasting Trauma

Numerous alumni detailed experiences that left deep scars. Shandi Sullivan from Cycle 2 recalled blacking out after drinking, waking up with a male model while cameras rolled unchecked. Producers labeled the episode “The Girl Who Cheated,” exacerbating her distress.[2]

Others faced body shaming and insensitivity. Keenyah Hill described harassment during a photoshoot that went ignored. Giselle Samson overheard judges mocking her figure, and winners like Dani Evans felt pressured to alter features such as her tooth gap.[2]

  • Body critiques targeting weights as low as 124 pounds.
  • Racial insensitivity, including black-, brown-, and yellowface challenges.
  • Unethical filming during vulnerable moments.
  • Contradictory advice on personal features across contestants.
  • Harassment dismissed in favor of spectacle.

Judges Break Silence on Production Realities

Panel staples Jay Manuel, Miss J. Alexander, and Nigel Barker offered unfiltered views. They admitted to fueling manipulated narratives and expressed regrets over their firings by Banks, which soured relationships. The series highlights how “good TV” trumped participant welfare.[1][2]

Whitney Thompson, a Cycle 10 winner, acknowledged career boosts amid the chaos. Still, the collective testimony painted a picture of a high-stakes environment where spectacle overshadowed support.[2]

Banks Faces Her Contradictions

Tyra Banks participated without production involvement, allowing candid scrutiny. Archival footage showed her advising Hill to eat a burger sans bun, juxtaposed against her stated mission. She addressed a 2005 panel meltdown with contestant Tiffany Richardson, repeating, “We were rooting for you.”[2]

In 2020, Banks tweeted apologies for past decisions, sending “virtual hugs.” The docuseries ends with her hinting at a potential Cycle 25 revival, blending reflection with forward ambition. Directors noted her cooperation signaled personal growth.[3]

Key Takeaways:

  • The show diversified runways but at a human cost.
  • Reality TV’s drama formula often exploited vulnerabilities.
  • Banks’ vision clashed with execution, prompting later accountability.

As beauty standards shift yet echo old biases, ‘Reality Check’ serves as a cautionary mirror for entertainment’s influence. Watch the series on Netflix and consider its lessons for today’s media landscape. What aspects of early reality TV surprise you most? Share in the comments.

Leave a Comment