Fulton County 2020 Absentee Ballots: A Persistent Numerical Discrepancy

Lean Thomas

Here's the Real Kicker About 2020 Fulton County Absentee Ballots
CREDITS: Wikimedia CC BY-SA 3.0

Share this post

Here's the Real Kicker About 2020 Fulton County Absentee Ballots

Federal Probe Intensifies Focus (Image Credits: Unsplash)

Fulton County, Georgia – Claims of irregularities in the processing of absentee ballots during the 2020 general election have resurfaced amid ongoing federal scrutiny of the county’s election records.

Federal Probe Intensifies Focus

FBI agents served a search warrant last week at Fulton County’s elections operations center in Union City, seizing hundreds of boxes containing 2020 ballots and related materials.[1][2] The action stemmed from a Justice Department effort to access voter data from the closely contested presidential race.

County officials responded swiftly, filing a motion in federal court to retrieve the materials and challenging the scope of the seizure.[3] This development has revived discussions about potential discrepancies in how absentee ballots were handled and reported.

Election integrity advocates pointed to the timing of the raid as an opportunity to reexamine official records from the period.

The Core Numerical Gap

Central to the renewed debate is a specific figure from Fulton County’s certified election summary report: 148,319 absentee ballots counted in the November 2020 general election.[4] This total appeared in the official five-column results document released by the county.

However, separate records purportedly show only 125,784 voters credited with casting absentee ballots, creating a gap of approximately 22,535.[5][6] Election attorney Cleta Mitchell highlighted this difference in a recent social media post, labeling it the “real kicker” in the Fulton County saga.[5]

Critics of the claim argue it stems from conflating distinct categories, such as ballots cast versus those fully processed or reported in voter files.[6] The county has faced prior complaints over absentee handling, including failures to process requests in earlier primaries.

Official Records and Past Audits

The Fulton County Department of Registration and Elections published its detailed summary report shortly after the election, confirming the 148,319 figure under absentee ballot totals.Official Election Summary Report[4] This document included breakdowns by precinct and race, with overall turnout reaching 65.57 percent.

Court-ordered reviews followed in subsequent years. In 2021, a judge allowed limited access to around 147,000 absentee ballots for inspection amid fraud allegations.[7] No widespread irregularities were confirmed in those audits, though some duplicate counts were identified and excluded from final tallies.

  • Absentee ballots counted: 148,319
  • Voters recorded as casting absentee: 125,784
  • Reported discrepancy: 22,535
  • FBI seizure date: January 28, 2026
  • County response: Court motion for return of materials

State officials referred earlier Fulton absentee mishandling cases to the attorney general, underscoring persistent administrative challenges.[8]

Broader Context of 2020 Scrutiny

Fulton County emerged as a focal point in post-election reviews due to its high volume of mail-in votes and reported operational issues, including a burst pipe at a key tabulation center on Election Night. The county delivered a strong Democratic margin in the presidential contest.

Recent federal involvement marks a shift, with the Trump administration pursuing access to sensitive records.[9] A judge recently dismissed related claims in a lawsuit seeking the ballots, but the FBI’s actions proceed independently.

Metric Reported Figure Source
Absentee Ballots Counted 148,319 County Summary Report[4]
Voters Credited 125,784 State/County Records[5]
Difference 22,535 Analysis

Key Takeaways

  • The 148,319 counted absentee ballots exceed recorded voter credits by over 22,000, prompting questions.
  • FBI seizure of records ties into broader 2020 election reviews.
  • County maintains operations improved post-2020 reforms like SB 202.

This numerical puzzle underscores the challenges of election administration in a high-stakes environment. As federal probes unfold, clarity on the records could restore confidence or fuel further debate. What do you think about these findings? Tell us in the comments.

Leave a Comment